Why value creation plans need an owner & deadline, not just ideas

Operators and investors,

The hard truth in private equity today is that many value creation plans are still little more than structured ambition.

I reviewed three VCPs last week for companies between $50M and $250M in revenue. Different sectors, different ownership dynamics, different management teams. The same failure pattern showed up in all three. Strong language around transformation. Serious claims around growth, efficiency, customer lifecycle, AI enablement, and cross-functional alignment. Very little that could be tied directly to an operating cadence, a budget line, an accountable owner, or a measurable P&L outcome.

That gap matters more in 2026 than it did a few years ago. Private equity deal activity has recovered, but the operating environment has not become more forgiving. McKinsey reports that global private equity deal value rose to $2.6 trillion in 2025, including nearly $1.8 trillion in buyouts, while Bain notes that elevated interest rates, high asset prices, and persistent liquidity pressure are making value creation harder across the industry. Bain also highlights a record $3.8 trillion in unrealized buyout value and holding periods at exit drifting toward seven years. In plain terms, firms have less room for wishful thinking and more pressure to convert operating plans into real earnings improvement.

A Value Creation Plan that does not translate into execution is not just unfinished work. It is a liability. When every basis point of EBITDA matters, vague initiatives create false confidence at the exact moment the business needs specificity.

1. The aspiration problem

The first failure point is simple: aspiration without action.

Most VCPs are full of phrases like “optimize customer lifecycle,” “improve retention,” “accelerate digital transformation,” “professionalize go-to-market,” or “enhance pricing strategy.” These are not initiatives. They are categories of intent.

At a strategy meeting last quarter, I was asked to include “customer lifecycle optimization” as a required element in a business roadmap. That was the full instruction. No scope. No defined friction point. No timeline. No system owner. No expected impact on renewals, churn, expansion, or cash flow.

This is how value creation plans become decorative. Everyone in the room agrees the direction sounds right, so the initiative survives. Nobody turns it into a project.

One of the VCPs I reviewed listed “Improve client retention” as a major value pillar. There were no associated workstreams, no dedicated budget, no team assignment, and no sequence of execution. If that were rewritten as an operational project, it might read very differently:

• reduce onboarding-related churn by 200 basis points within two quarters

• assign ownership to a specific commercial leader

• fund the project with implementation budget and dedicated team time

• instrument the customer journey so the leakage points are visible weekly

• tie success to a quantified ARR retention target

That is the difference between a pillar and a plan.

The pattern is widespread.

KPMG’s 2026 M&A Deal Market Study found that in post-merger environments, the biggest risks to value realization cited by private equity respondents were loss of key talent (61%), failure to track synergies (59%), and leadership and culture misalignment (59%). Those are not abstract strategic failures. They are execution failures, made worse when plans stay too general to manage.

2. The ownership problem

The second failure point is the missing “who” and “when.”

A VCP without assigned responsibility and hard deadlines is not a management system. It is a collective hope exercise.

This sounds obvious, but it is still one of the most common breakdowns in portfolio execution. The initiative exists in the deck. Multiple functions are “involved.” Everyone agrees it matters. No one is individually accountable for delivering it.

I recently pushed a portfolio company to assign a single owner to a revamped customer onboarding motion, with part of the upside tied directly to results. Before that, it had been treated as some blend of product, customer success, and revenue operations. In reality, it belonged to no one. Meanwhile, avoidable churn tied to poor onboarding was running at roughly 15% annually.

The same issue appears in dozens of forms:

• pricing optimization with no commercial lead

• CRM cleanup with no executive sponsor

• AI automation with no workflow owner

• cross-sell strategy with no account-level accountability

• platform consolidation with no budget or migration deadline

Once ownership is blurred, timelines become soft by default. “Ongoing.” “In progress.” “Targeting next quarter.” These phrases create the appearance of movement without the pressure of a deliverable.

The private equity market is not rewarding that kind of looseness anymore. McKinsey reports that roughly 70% of LPs surveyed planned to maintain or increase their private equity allocations in 2026, but that support comes alongside a much sharper focus on manager quality, discipline, and the ability to drive outcomes in a tougher operating environment.

In practice, that means VCPs need to behave more like operating plans and less like investment committee narratives.

3. The resource problem

The third failure point is just as damaging: initiatives are prioritized with no real allocation behind them.

This is where many VCPs become structurally dishonest. They list ten or fifteen major priorities, imply meaningful EBITDA expansion, and assume the business can absorb the work with the same people, the same systems, and no additional budget.

Do not confuse this with value creation. That is execution debt.

Every serious project should answer four questions up front:

• what exactly is being changed

• who owns it

• what resources are committed

• what financial outcome is expected if it works

Without that, the plan is asking management to deliver outcomes with unfunded mandates.

This is especially visible in anything touching commercial systems, digital infrastructure, data, or AI. A company cannot claim it will improve conversion, reduce churn, standardize reporting, automate support workflows, rationalize platforms, and improve margin visibility if it has not allocated implementation capacity, executive attention, and enough budget to get the work done properly.

The reason this matters is that value creation increasingly depends on operating infrastructure, not just strategic direction.

EY’s work on private equity value creation highlights the need for continuous monitoring, forecasting, and alignment of business drivers through technology and management visibility across the investment lifecycle. If the operating layer is weak, the value creation plan does not fail because the idea was wrong. It fails because the organization cannot execute it at the necessary speed.

From wish list to roadmap

The real work is translating broad goals into actionable projects with an expected P&L effect.

That requires discipline. It also requires choosing fewer things and managing them more seriously.

Instead of “optimize customer lifecycle,” the project might become:

• deploy conversation intelligence tooling for sales discovery review by the end of Q3

• redesign onboarding handoff between sales and customer success within 45 days

• launch a structured win-back campaign for churned accounts with named ownership and a 90-day pilot

• instrument expansion and renewal triggers inside the CRM and leadership dashboard by a fixed date

Each of these can be budgeted. Each can be staffed. Each can be tracked. Each can be judged against a measurable financial expectation.

The same logic applies to more technical or infrastructure-heavy initiatives, which are often ignored in VCPs even though they shape execution quality directly. In mid-market and PE-backed businesses, some of the most important value creation projects are not branding or strategy exercises. They are operating system projects:

• unify CRM and finance definitions so forecasts and actuals reconcile

• rebuild lead routing and lifecycle attribution so sales capacity is not wasted

• stabilize a high-scale web platform that directly supports lead generation, onboarding, support, or self-service conversion

• consolidate fragmented analytics and reporting into a decision-grade dashboard for management and the board

• automate specific support, reporting, or content workflows with AI where the savings are measurable and the process is mature enough to support it

These are the kinds of initiatives that move a business from aspiration to execution. They also happen to be the ones most likely to get diluted when VCPs stay too abstract.

Link every initiative to the P&L

This is the test I would apply to every VCP line item: if it succeeds, where exactly does the P&L move?

Too many initiatives are approved because they sound strategically relevant. Very few are framed with enough precision to quantify how they change revenue, gross margin, churn, cost-to-serve, or working capital.

That has to change.

A value creation plan should force financial clarity, not postpone it. Every major initiative should have an explicit economic thesis attached to it:

• increase ARR by X

• reduce churn by Y basis points

• improve sales efficiency by Z

• cut servicing cost per customer by a defined amount

• reduce reporting delay from weekly lag to near real-time visibility

• eliminate duplicate tooling or manual workload with measurable savings

When the P&L link is missing, prioritization becomes political. When the P&L link is explicit, leadership can decide what deserves investment and what belongs on a parking lot list.

This matters even more in the current market because firms are being pushed to create value operationally, not through multiple expansion alone. Bain’s 2026 reporting is clear that below the megadeal level, recovery has been uneven and liquidity issues remain a persistent constraint. That makes operational follow-through more important than polished planning language.

What a credible VCP should include

A serious value creation plan should read more like an execution portfolio than a strategy memo.

At minimum, it should include:

• a tightly defined list of initiatives, not a broad catalog of themes

• one accountable owner per project

• fixed milestones and hard dates

• committed budget and resourcing assumptions

• dependencies across systems, teams, and vendors

• a quantified financial outcome tied to the P&L

• weekly or biweekly operating visibility, not just quarterly board updates

For portfolio companies with meaningful digital and commercial complexity, I would add three more requirements:

• a systems map showing where data, reporting, and workflow ownership currently break down

• a revenue operations layer that connects go-to-market activity to finance and delivery reality

• a technology and AI workstream focused on operational efficiency, not experimentation for its own sake

That last point deserves emphasis. AI belongs in a VCP only where the process is mature enough to automate and the outcome can be measured. Bain found that about 45% of executives used AI in M&A in 2025, more than double the prior year, and more than half expect AI to have a significant effect on how deals are done. That is useful context.

But the practical question for operators is narrower: which workflows can AI improve now without introducing noise, governance risk, or bad data into critical decisions?

Mario

📉 I bought Semrush at $13.20. Adobe aquired at $12. That's the market telling you something. Three SaaS names I believed in - Semrush, Zoom, Asana - all got repriced by the same force: a $20/month AI license doing 60% of what a $1,000/month plan used to justify. If you're still valuing portfolio companies on ARR multiples without discounting for AI substitution risk, the Semrush exit is a data point you can't ignore. Organic search intelligence just showed you where the floor drops first.

🏗️ I received a Webit Changemakers nomination this week - and my honest reaction was complicated. I've spent thousands of hours teaching inside VMware, SAP, universities, and DevriX while keeping a deliberately low profile locally, because 90% of my business runs through North America and Western Europe. The tension every operator knows: too much visibility is performative, too little costs you the A-players who need proof before they commit.

RevOps and AI customer experience Sierra raises $950M at a $15B valuation to scale its AI customer experience platform. The round - led by Tiger Global and GV - brings the company past $1B in dry powder as it pushes to become the global standard for AI-powered customer experiences across enterprise accounts - signaling where mid-market and enterprise RevOps spend is migrating as agentic CX moves from pilot to platform.

PE outperformance data point PE and VC-backed European firms grew jobs 4% in 2024, expanding workforces four times faster than the broader European economy. Invest Europe's seventh annual Private Equity at Work report underscores that disciplined sponsor ownership continues to drive outsized headcount and operational growth across portfolio companies, even with exit windows still narrow and DPI lagging historical averages.

Mid-market PE add-on with founder rollover Platinum Equity acquires Infratech from its founders, with both remaining equity holders and the CEO continuing in seat. The 50-year-old infrared electric heating brand serves residential and commercial heat applications under sustained owner-operator leadership now backed by institutional capital - a structure that aligns founder upside with the value creation plan rather than handing Platinum a leadership vacuum on day one.

PE divestiture and portfolio focus ManpowerGroup divests Jefferson Wells US to Sikich for $100M as it sharpens its portfolio focus. The professional services unit generated $76M in 2025 US revenue across risk and compliance, finance and accounting, and tax consulting work for public and highly regulated companies - leaving ManpowerGroup with roughly $88M in net cash proceeds and giving Sikich a regulated-industry consulting book that bolts directly onto its existing platform.

High-Revenue B2B SaaS Agency: Invest in an 8-year marketing agency powering enterprise B2B SaaS growth with intent-driven, multichannel campaigns. Proven performance with strong revenue and profitability. $50,000-500,000

Established Marketing Agency: 7-year-old marketing agency with recurring income from long-term client retainers and project work. The team delivers performance marketing, web design, and email marketing services. $880,628

Niche Real Estate Marketing Agency: 4-year-old real estate marketing agency serving investors and wholesalers with a proven, niche-focused delivery model. Run remotely with an owner-light setup at 15–20 hours per week. $1,100,000

Augmented Agentic Infrastructure Platform: Acquire a 10-year PaaS company powering AGI-driven autonomous operations with 45:1 inference optimization across global delivery. Strong performance with $4.28M revenue, 67% profit margin, and a $6.19M anchor contract backed by 90% financing. $10,950,918

Working with me

🌐 Scaling $30M - $100M+ mid-market companies with value creation through RevOps, data engineering, and WordPress. DevriX provides full RevOps consulting + delivery with GTM enablement for PE-backed portfolio companies, traditional tech, healthcare, finance, and professional service businesses pacing toward revenue growth initiatives. Our standard retainers between $10K and $60K include revenue lifecycle services for marketing and sales leaders, FP&A for financial teams, pipeline enrichment through websites and dozens of lead sources, automations and delivery integrations, CRO and ongoing testing, product delivery and platform integration solutions, and more through our consulting solutions.

🚀 1:1 Advisory retainers. At Growth Shuttle, I run two popular plans: Async Advisory ($3,500/mo) for $3M - $30M founders and executive teams and the smaller Strategic Growth Circle ($997/mo) for $100K - $500K entrepreneurs, agency founders, scale ups. My fractional executive plan is also available here.

📈 Building US LLCs from Europe. I help European and Asian founders scale faster through doola and their “Business in a Box” model. Also suitable for US citizens (given their bookkeeping solution), but in very high demand across Europe.

📊 Post-Merger Integration. We take on M&A initiatives with Flippa. Working closely on PMI retainers for PE companies and fast-growing startups integrating new companies within their portfolios, enabling data pipelines, and securing more deals through my personal network.