- Growth Shuttle Insider
- Posts
- Sequoia counts $6 of services spend for every $1 of software
Sequoia counts $6 of services spend for every $1 of software
PE has bought into the services side since 2021 + what autopilots, the All-In forecasts and the hiring data mean for the holds
Operators and investors,
Sequoia's Julien Bek put a ratio on the AI market back in March: "For every dollar spent on software, six are spent on services."

His thesis is that the next $1T company sells the work itself (an autopilot) and not a tool for the professional doing it (a copilot) - so a better model makes that work faster and cheaper to deliver.
I spoke about this ratio at the opening night of Sofia Startup Society on Monday, and I've been coming back to the number since, because for private equity it's a portfolio question more than a market one.

Sofia Startup Meetup
Insurance brokerage, accounting and audit, IT managed services and healthcare revenue cycle all sit on Sequoia's map of autopilot targets.
Sponsors already own a good part of that side too - since 2021, PE funds have taken ownership of around 24 of the top 100 US CPA firms, including at least 10 of the top 30, per CFO Brew.
At the All-In Summit, Jensen Huang listed forecasts that missed and Satya Nadella pointed at the change management adoption still needs. The hiring data shows which work moves first.
I'm not convinced the 6 shrinks on the forecasters' schedule, but the part billed as junior hours will.
Todayβs newsletter covers 4 topics:
Autopilots start with work companies already outsource
Services firms sell the change management that adoption needs
Senior roles carry the hiring rebound while junior hiring lags
A services company in the portfolio needs two price lists
At DevriX we've run embedded teams since 2015, and the person who scopes the work delivers it - more on our work inside PE-backed businesses.
1. Autopilots start with work companies already outsource
Sequoia's playbook starts where outsourcing already exists.
A company that buys the work from an outside firm has already accepted that the work can be done outside. There's a budget line to substitute, and the buyer is paying for an outcome.
Swapping that contract for an AI-native provider is a vendor change. Replacing headcount is a reorganization - so the outsourced work goes first.
Bek's map puts a labour budget on several categories: insurance brokerage at $140-200B, IT managed services at $100B+, accounting and audit at $50-80B and healthcare revenue cycle at $50-80B in outsourced US spend.
These are the contracts a PE-backed accounting firm, MSP or revenue cycle platform holds today.
An autopilot doesn't need to win the whole client, just the intelligence-heavy part of the contract (patching, monitoring, medical coding, closing the books).
Sequoia expects copilot companies to hit the innovator's dilemma here, since selling the work cuts out the professionals who buy their tools.
A sponsor-owned services platform has an option the copilots don't - the work is already what they sell, so they can automate delivery and keep the client.
2. Services firms sell the change management that adoption needs
At the All-In Summit, Satya Nadella said there's already "a massive model overhang" - the models are very good, but the change management needed to rework workflows around them is what's taking time.
Jensen Huang used his session to list forecasts that missed. Radiology automation, 90% of code written by AI and half of entry-level jobs disappearing all blew past their own deadlines.
I'd read both as remarks about timing, even if the direction isn't in question.
The 6 moves in stages, and the first stage is services work in itself: mapping workflows, cleaning the records an agent reads, setting review rules and retraining the team that used to do the task.
If you own a services firm, the hold is going to include a window to sell the transition to your own clients - before an autopilot sells them the outcome.
3. Senior roles carry the hiring rebound while junior hiring lags
Software is where there's the most data right now.
Indeed Hiring Lab shows US software development postings up almost 15% since Claude Code launched in late February 2025, while overall postings fell 7%.
The rebound starts low, with postings still about 27.5% below their pre-pandemic level. The rebound is also concentrated - 71% of the increase between May 2025 and May 2026 came from senior roles, and 37% from jobs with AI in the title.

I spent Tuesday on the future of software development at XtremeJS 2026, and the front-end forecasts point the same way.
GreatFrontEnd's read of the market describes routine UI work as exactly what AI coding assistants now do well. The same piece cites Stanford research putting employment of 22- to 25-year-olds in highly AI-exposed occupations about 19% below where it would have been, next to peers in less exposed jobs.
For a services roll-up, this is the margin question.
A firm built as a pyramid (senior people sell, junior people deliver) earns on the hours AI absorbs first. I'd expect revenue per head to go up over the next few years at the firms that rebuild delivery, and down at the ones that wait.
I keep asking myself the question senior candidates now face - what have you done in the past 6 months that was impossible 5 years ago?
4. A services company in the portfolio needs two price lists
My forecast for services firms, ours included, is two price lists that never mix.
Work a machine can do (monitoring, checks, patching, reconciliations) gets sold like software - an outcome, with no person on the account.
Judgement (architecture, a migration plan, what to build next) gets sold as senior hours, fewer of them and at a higher rate.
Sequoia's own example is IT managed services. The software layer sells tools to the MSP, but no vendor sells the running IT estate to the company as an outcome yet.
If you hold an MSP, you're closer to that product than any startup - the clients and the environments are already there.
Here's the rule I'd hold portfolio companies to, and the one we use at DevriX: we ship agentic AI and automation into production with a human approval step on anything irreversible.
This week, I'd want 2 numbers from the services companies in the portfolio ahead of the next board meeting:
last quarter's billed hours split into intelligence work and judgement work, using Sequoia's definitions
the share of these hours clients already buy as an outsourced outcome - that's the revenue an autopilot competes for first
Mario
My Take
π° Interlock Equity sold Lovelytics to CDW for about $525M after it grew from 60 to 600+ specialists. Interlock partnered in 2023 when Lovelytics was 60 people, and it's now 600+ data and AI specialists, with Databricks co-investing early (its first investment in a consultancy partner). That's roughly $875K of enterprise value per employee for a services firm.
πΌ Francisco Partners closed the $650M take-private of Weave at about a 34% premium. Weave runs patient communication and payments for 40,000+ healthcare practice locations. Francisco Partners closed the take-private last week at $7.40 a share in cash, and FP says the plan is to build on that base with AI-driven product development.
π We tracked 1,390 hours on one multi-site program, and 14% went to rework after client feedback. Nobody on the team would have guessed that split, and every individual task looked fine. Over six months on that program, 48% of the hours went to planned build, 16% to coordination and 14% to rework after client feedback. That came out of what we call the AI Hive.
π§ AI is like a freshly graduated lawyer with five years of knowledge and zero experience. At LA CorpGov in September, the line I wrote down verbatim was that AI is like a freshly graduated lawyer with five years of knowledge and zero experience. Still the closest description of what I see running agents.
π― In consumer buyouts, repeat rates that depend on promotions are the risk to underwrite. A consumer brand that looks healthy at LOI can unravel before the first board meeting when repeat rates turn out to depend on promotional spend. The durability framework for consumer buyouts Can the brand hold pricing power when demand softens, will customers return without heavy marketing, and does the channel mix protect or erode margin?
π’ A take-private candidate can trade at 6x EBITDA while private peers transact at 9x. A $400 million market-cap company whose analyst coverage dropped from five firms to one trades at a structural discount. The screening framework for public-to-private arbitrage Spotting it before the competition requires a disciplined framework rather than opportunistic deal-chasing.
PE Community Notes
ποΈ Thank you to Thomas Allgeyer for including us in Best of LinkedIn CW 44/ 45: Private Equity: Value Creation. - by Thomas Allgeyer
ποΈ A fair question for portfolio management teams is whether AI is helping create more value for customers in ways competitors cannot easily replicate. - by Russ Roenick
ποΈ Deal teams want CEOs who are strategic and tactical, empathetic and willing to fire, but every leadership strength comes with a corresponding tradeoff and personality rarely changes after investment. - by Maxwell Salazar
ποΈ Companies are adopting AI slowly now, but eventually those that figure out the right tech stack will see job reductions, or they will be obviated by AI-native competitors that can move faster and produce more quickly. - by Larry Cheng
ποΈ Exa's CRO explains that with consumption pricing you earn the customer again every month through SLAs and shipping, with no renewal moment and no safety net. - by Max Altschuler
ποΈ India invested through its PLI scheme to reduce dependence on Chinese antibiotics, but Aurobindo's Kakinada facility has initiated an anti-dumping case because even with state support it cannot compete with Chinese pricing on penicillin G imports. - by Gabriel Morelli
ποΈ In the US election, 37 of 38 local data center measures went against the industry, and Texas elected a governor who promised a day-one moratorium. - by Brendan Wallace
ποΈ Navtor's strategic sale to Alfa Laval after four years demonstrates that despite claims about SaaS disruption there remains significant market value for businesses that consistently deliver value in maritime e-navigation software. - by Neil Patel
ποΈ Fund content is a targeting problem because a post can generate high impressions but reach no LPs and the audience that matters is a few dozen allocators who will never like a post. - by Riley Kaminer
Market insights & opportunities

Marlin Equity Partners backed an independent cybersecurity audit firm. Insight Assurance received a strategic growth investment from Marlin Equity Partners, its first institutional capital since its founding in 2020, with terms not disclosed.
A tech-enabled advisory firm added a NetSuite practice. WilliamsMarston acquired Charted's NetSuite Services practice, adding NetSuite professionals focused on implementation, optimization, support and advisory services.
Thoma Bravo is raising its first growth equity fund. Thoma Bravo is targeting $3 billion for its debut growth equity fund, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Bain Capital's Asia special situations strategy is on its third fund. Bain Capital raised over $1.8 billion for its third Asia special situations fund.

Online tenant advocacy business: Profitable online tenant advocacy business generating $201K revenue and $162K profit (81% margin), 2 years old. $323,370
Digital brand engagement platform for luxury automotive: Digital brand engagement platform for the luxury automotive industry with $2M contract value on 3-year rolling term, $11.5K monthly profit, 4 years old. $3,195,155
B2B SaaS ecosystem for speakers and coaches: 7-year B2B SaaS ecosystem with 7 platforms powering 1,600+ speakers and coaches, $8.48K monthly profit, recurring revenue, zero marketing spend. $855,781
Vape eCommerce business: Premium 17-year vape eCommerce business with $766K TTM revenue, $37.1K monthly profit, 75% of orders from repeat buyers, organic SEO customer acquisition. $850,000
Deal board
The 12 newest of 13 private equity deals we tracked, announced from Nov 2 to Nov 9. Each firm and company links to its PE Firm Index profile where it has one.

Nov 9 Intermatic, an MPE Partners portfolio company, acquired Sun-Tech (Add-on). Axios
Nov 5 Universal Investment, a Montagu Private Equity portfolio company, acquired Cadarn Capital (Add-on). universal-investment.com
Nov 5 The Riverside Company acquired Specialty Packaging Rental Provider (Platform). globenewswire.com
Nov 5 PAI Partners acquired British skincare brand Elemis (Platform). privateequitywire.com
Nov 5 Cinven acquired Theramex (Platform). privateequitywire.com
Nov 5 Providence Equity Partners acquired Fitness Park (Platform). linkedin.com
Nov 4 Brite, a Sole Source Capital portfolio company, acquired Xobee Networks (Add-on). Axios
Nov 4 One Rock Capital Partners acquired North America Coffee Business (Platform). onerock.com
Nov 3 GrowthCurve Capital acquired TailorMed (Platform). Axios
Nov 3 ChiroHD, a Mainsail Partners portfolio company, acquired ChiroBilling (Add-on). linkedin.com
Nov 3 Royal Reesink, a Triton Partners portfolio company, acquired Price Turfcare (Add-on). triton-partners.com
Nov 2 Protective, a Genstar Capital portfolio company, acquired Obsidian (Add-on). gencap.com
The board updates daily on PE Firm Index.
PE Digital Index
This week's cut of the index: the 92 PE-backed companies in manufacturing, on the three measures where they differ most from all 915 PE-backed service and product companies.

13 of 89 (15%) have the full path from search to CRM, against 27% of all 883 PE-backed service and product companies.
23 of 92 (25%) put a call to action on the homepage, against 50% of all 915 PE-backed service and product companies.
44 of 92 (48%) run a CRM or marketing automation detectable on the site, against 67% of all 915 PE-backed service and product companies.
From The 2027 Digital Value Creation Baseline, our study of 1,407 PE-backed companies. Each issue carries one cut of it.
For PE partners and operators seeking alpha
π Scaling $50M - $500M+ mid-market companies with value creation through RevOps, data engineering, and WordPress. DevriX provides full RevOps consulting + delivery with GTM enablement for PE-backed portfolio companies, traditional tech, healthcare, finance, and professional service businesses pacing toward revenue growth initiatives. Our standard retainers between $10K and $60K include revenue lifecycle services for marketing and sales leaders, FP&A for financial teams, pipeline enrichment through websites and dozens of lead sources, automations and delivery integrations, CRO and ongoing testing, product delivery and platform integration solutions, and more through our consulting solutions.
π 1:1 Advisory retainers. Supporting operating partners, private equity funds, family offices, and mid-market executives in different capacities, from value creation through due diligence to portfolio digital GTM management in my async advisory programs via Growth Shuttle.
π GTM while scaling. European and international businesses can opt in for doola LLC and their βBusiness in a Boxβ model. Scaling founders can find smaller digital opportunities on Flippa. Additional opportunities across my investments can be found here.
Some links in this issue are affiliate or partner links. If you sign up through one, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
